Mandelbrot set image very small MohammedAmin.com
Fresh thinking from a
British Muslim
Follow @Mohammed_Amin
Email list

Search this site

Custom Search
MohammedAmin.com     Tap here for MENU

Summary

Gaza and the need for peace now

28 December 2008

Like hundreds of millions around the world, I was horrified by the brutality of the airborne Israeli assault on Gaza on 27 December 2008 which left hundreds dead. As well as Hamas fighters, the dead included police trainees and countless other civilians. With many years of experience bombing Palestinians, Israel will not have been surprised by the numbers killed or the mix between civilians and Hamas fighters. One must regard the deaths as intended.

Sadly this looks like the first shot of the Israeli election campaign, as Tzipi Livni competes with Benjamin Netanyahu to show who can be toughest in dealing with the Palestinians. For the Israeli government, the death of one Israeli citizen appears enough to justify killing any number of Palestinians.

A policy of disproportionality

From its foundation, Israel's policy has been that "an eye for an eye" is not enough. Instead every provocation must be met with overwhelming force as otherwise the Arabs will only be "emboldened."

Regardless of its morality, this policy had a rational basis when Israel's foes comprised Arab states unwilling to suffer the material and personnel losses entailed by total war. However, from the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, Israel's policy of disproportionate response has been shown to be increasingly futile. The Palestinians living in the prison camp that is Gaza feel they have no future to lose. The more brutally Israel attacks them, the more determined they are to hit back no matter what their own losses.

However, I believe that notwithstanding their tanks, combat aeroplanes and nuclear weapons, it is the Israelis who fear the future and not the Palestinians despite their having nothing but Kalashnikovs and home-made rockets.

The darkest hour is just before dawn

Despite the bloodshed, I see more hope for peace than at any time since the Oslo Peace Accords were systematically sabotaged by Benjamin Netanyahu after the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin.

It is always easy to defer making peace; deferral allows both Israel and the Palestinians to put off facing up to difficult choices. For years, ardent Zionists who covet every square metre of Palestine have hoped that if they could put off peace for long enough, they could create enough "facts on the ground" in the form of illegal settlements that a Palestinian state would become impossible. However, time is not on Israel's side. With every year that passes, it has less allied countries. E.g. the change in South Africa's position after the fall of the apartheid regime. Meanwhile economic growth in the Muslim world and in countries with large Muslim minorities like China and India steadily shifts the geopolitics against Israel.

After ignoring the issue for President Bush's first seven years, the United States realised 12 months ago just how much the conflict in the Middle East damages its relations with large parts of world. Peace is in the interests of the USA, Britain, Europe, the surrounding Arab states and indeed the rest of the world. These countries do possess enough leverage on Israel and the Palestinians to impose a permanent peace.

Peace also cannot wait for an end to violence, as that makes peace a hostage to every gunman who wishes to stop the negotiations. Instead we need negotiations in 2009 leading to a final settlement.

A framework for peace

Leaving to one side the maximum demands of the Israelis and Palestinians, it is clear to the rest of the world what a permanent peace agreement would look like. It would be based on the Saudi Arabian peace plan of 2002.

Israel needs to withdraw to its pre-1967 boundary, leaving Gaza and the West Bank for a Palestinian state which will be prohibited from possessing tanks or combat aircraft. The holy places in Jerusalem must be internationalised, and any territorial adjustments must involve equal exchanges of land.

Perhaps most painful, the Palestinians will have to give up any claim to a right of return to Israeli territory, instead receiving compensation in cash and the offer of citizenship in the countries where they live if they don't want to return to Gaza or the West Bank.

While the rest of the world can demand that Israel withdraws from the occupied territories, it cannot demand that Israel allows a return of the Palestinians which would quickly reduce the Jews to a minority within Israel. No Zionist who remembers how in 1939 Cuba, the United States and Britain sent Jewish refugees on the SS St. Louis back to Nazi Germany, where many were eventually murdered, will ever allow Israel's security to be imperilled by the influx of millions of Palestinians. The phrase "Never again" is not negotiable. The right of return cannot be imposed upon a nuclear armed Israel by either military or economic means; if necessary the Israelis will "Eat grass" in Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's memorable words.

Peace cannot rectify all past wrongs; it can only provide a basis for creating the future for both peoples. When the Palestinians have something to live for, Hamas and other rejectionists will be marginalised.

What should British Muslims do?

We need to speak up by writing to the press and to our elected politicians. The key points to make are:

  1. The Palestinians of Gaza need immediate humanitarian relief with a lifting of Israel's blockade. In particular it is unconscionable for British banks to impede the flow of charitable funds to Gaza without any evidence of their being diverted to non-humanitarian purposes.
  2. Israel needs peace every bit as much as do the Palestinians.
  3. Achieving Middle East peace will be in Britain's national interest, both by reducing the threat of terrorism here and abroad and by advancing Britain's commercial opportunities overseas.
  4. Giving unqualified support to Israel, a single nation of seven million, at the expense of damaging Britain's relations with 57 Muslim majority countries comprising well over a billion people is not in Britain's national interest.

Can people of goodwill around the world help the Israelis and Palestinians to make peace? Under the impending administration of President Obama, the only possible answer is "Yes we can!"

 

The Disqus comments facility below allows you to comment on this page. Please respect others when commenting.
You can login using any of your Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Disqus identities.
Even if you are not registered on any of these, you can still post a comment.
comments powered by Disqus

 

Custom Search

Follow @Mohammed_Amin

Tap to return to top of page

Each of us changes the world every day. We can choose to make it a better place.

(c) Mohammed Amin.

Everything on this site, other than comments made using the comments facility, is written by me in a personal capacity and should not be attributed to any organisation with which I may be associated. None of it constitutes professional advice, and no legal responsibility is accepted to anyone who acts, or refrains from acting, as a result of reading or watching anything posted on this site.

Comments made on this site using the comments facility are the responsibility of the individual comment authors. If you consider that any comment defames you, please email Mohammed Amin using the facility on the "Contact me" page, specifying the page, the comment author and the date and time of the comment, and the reasons it is defamatory so that the comment can be removed.

The ownership of this site is stated on the "Legal" page. Mohammed Amin is a participant in the Amazon Europe S.à.r.l. Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.co.uk/Javari.co.uk.